In the leading case on employment status, Uber BV and others v Aslam (2021), the Supreme Court warned against treating the terms of the contract as the starting point in determining whether an individual is a worker or an employee. This is because contract terms don’t necessarily reflect reality and are open to abuse.
However, in the recent case of Dr Mark Ter-Berg v Simply Smile Manor House Ltd and others the Employment Appeal Tribunal clarified that the written contract can still be taken into account as long as it is not:
However, in the recent case of Dr Mark Ter-Berg v Simply Smile Manor House Ltd and others the Employment Appeal Tribunal clarified that the written contract can still be taken into account as long as it is not:
- looked at in isolation;
- treated as conclusive in relation to the issue of employment status; and
- allowed to create a presumption of employment status that is not supported by the facts and circumstances of the case.