Proposed Reform to Restrictive Covenants 
There has always been a need to strike a balance between protecting the interests of an employer and an employee when the employment relationship comes to an end. One way this is done is through the use of restrictive covenants or post-termination restrictions. One type of restrictive covenant is a non-compete clause, which restricts where an employee can be employed following their termination.

There are different types of restrictive covenants including non-solicitation and non-dealing clauses however, non-compete clauses are seen as the most restrictive type.

Back in 2020 the government launched a consultation into the use and reform of non-compete clause. They have recently published their response to this consultation. The government has committed to introducing the following: 

 
  • A three-month limit to non-compete clauses.
  • No mandatory compensation for non-compete clauses, and
  • Guidance on non-compete clauses.

The Government currently has no plans to apply the three-month limit to other types of restrictive covenants such as non-solicitation and non-dealing or clauses preventing poaching of employees or interfering with suppliers, subject to the normal considerations of reasonableness.

It is worth bearing in mind that if and when these changes do come into force, limiting a non-compete to 3 months will not automatically make it legally enforceable as there will be no change to the requirement for these clauses to be reasonable in order to be enforceable.
So What?
 
Whilst these changes have not been implemented yet, non-compete clauses should be regularly reviewed. The reason for this is that a non-compete clause (as well as other types of restriction) can only be relied upon if they are reasonable and go no further than is necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests.

A non-compete of three months may still be unenforceable if it places a blanket ban on any employment or seeks to operate what could be a reasonable restriction, in areas the employer is not competing. Geographical range is one thing that can be overlooked, for example a range that is reasonable outside London, may be too wide for a London based business, depending of course on the nature of the business and the role.

We will provide updates as these changes progress.

In the meantime, if you are currently reviewing your contracts or have questions regarding current or proposed restrictive covenants, please contact one of our employment advisors.

Tom Radcliffe, Trainee Employment Law Consultant, Vista
 
[bot_catcher]